Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Today's the day! So will the Lords do the only right thing?

So today's the day. The last chance for the Lords to vote for an amendment to call for a pause to the proposed changes to DLA (Disability Living Allowance). If not it will be seamlessly morphed into the unfit for purpose PIP (no, not the dodgy boob implants, the equally dodgy Personal Independence Payment!) that may well make unbearable and unlivable the lives of the most vulnerable disabled citizens in our country. They were promised they would never be betrayed. Through the tireless efforts of the disabled through the "Responsible Reform" Report, a new amendment has been tabled.

Again this is the eleventh hour. Again the disabled are fighting for their lives.
With M.E., plus Type 1 Diabetes with frequent severe and unannounced hypos, it has taken all my strength and last shred of dignity just to be transferred from IB to ESA. Even though incompetent and duplicitous ATOS have now plopped me unceremoniously into the incorrect WRAG (Work Related Activity Group), I'm pathetically relieved and thankful they deemed me of limited capability for work at all, given the current level of wrong decisions going to appeal. When I turn up crashed, brainfogged and crippled in my dogcollar at the Jobcentre again, we'll see exactly where their areas of expertise lie.

I have never applied for DLA (Disability Living Allowance) myself, just because, although I have long periods when I seem to fit its most stringent criteria, I find it hard enough to claim the ESA I need to survive, without having yet another ongoing claim where officials can look on me as if I have crawled out from under a stone. If I can manage, I will. The criteria for qualification for PIP were released yesterday here.

I am often like Katy in Case Study 1, but living alone. In that scenario I would qualify for PIP with "enhanced rate Daily Living component" and "enhanced rate Mobility component". At other periods my health may mean I more resemble Rachel in Case Study 2 who qualifies for nothing. Sorry my fluctuating serious lifelong illnesses are inconvenient enough not to fit the tick boxes. Sorry my body refuses to a)recover or b) die for your convenience! No wonder I daren't apply!


The whole PIP assessment thresholds leave you confused and despairing at the sheer lack of coherence and understanding of disability. There is so much emphasis on the upper body that you have to ask yourself if the DWP think all disabled people are mermaids, without legs or crotch.

Ironically, if I can go back to work, the fluctuating and lifelong conditions I have mean I might probably need to claim DLA for extra transport and mobility costs, etc. One day, any one of us might.

So here's the email I've just sent to about 90 Crossbench peers, following a flurry of tweets last night.
If the Government don't tamper with any more balls, sanity and victory may be almost within our grasp!
Email to Crossbench peers:
This morning, the following amendment has been tabled :

Clause 80 - Amendment 50E

BARONESS GREY-THOMPSON
BARONESS WILKINS
LORD LOW OF DALSTON
BARONESS CAMPBELL OF SURBITON

Page 58, line 26, at end insert—

“( ) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an independent review of the plans for implementation of the assessments under section 79 before the provisions are brought into effect, and such plans must in particular provide for—

(a) a trial period before any assessment process is implemented fully for new applicants and those transferring from DLA;

(b) disabled persons organisations to be involved in formulating the assessment process.


On behalf of all genuinely sick and disabled people, their families and carers , may I ask you to make it an urgent priority today to vote for this vital amendment to the Welfare Reform Bill?


Following the wise, compassionate and reasoned “Responsible Reform” (also known as the Spartacus Report), the rest of society is starting to grasp the deeply flawed nature of the proposed reforms as they stand. Without a pause today, devastating and unjust changes will be rushed into law. The amendment calls for a pause to reconsider and amend before it is too late. 

We all understand how essential is giving disabled citizens a life that is not just barely tolerable, but which gives them a chance to thrive and enable them to use all their gifts and talents to enrich society, while having quality of life themselves with all their added costs and difficulties in accessing what others take for granted. The Welfare Reform Bill as it stands, without serious amendments, will cost the country so much more in the long run than has been mendaciously suggested by some.

I respectfully beg you to help by doing your part to understand the real issues and vote for what is right.
Thank you so much for your time and attention,
yours sincerely,
etc
Sent to: andrew@amawsonpartnerships.com,
alastair@aberdares.co.uk,
adebowalev@parliament.uk,
afsharh@parliament.uk,
michael.allenby@btinternet.com,
altond@parliament.uk,
amosv@parliament.uk,
armstrongr@parliament.uk,
best@parliament.uk,
p.bew@qub.ac.uk,
abhatia@casley.co.uk,
bilimoria@parliament.uk,
birtj@parliament.uk,
BOOTHROYD@parliament.uk,
brabazoni@parliament.uk,
bramallen@parliament.uk,
lady.briggs@googlemail.com,
butlerslosse@parliament.uk,
campbelljs@parliament.uk,
carswellr@parliament.uk,
deechr@parliament.uk,
dafydd.elis-thomas@wales.gov.uk,
errollm@parliament.uk,
finlayi@parliament.uk,
freybergv@parliament.uk,
fritchiei@parliament.uk,
greenfieldsuuk,
greengrosss@parliament.uk,
greenwaya@parliament.uk,
greythompsont@parliament.uk,
crlguthrie@gmail.com,
halla@parliament.uk,
harriesr@parliament.uk,
hastingsm@parliament.uk,
haymanh@parliament.uk,
hennessyp@parliament.uk,
hoffmannl@parliament.uk,
HoggS@parliament.uk,
HOPEJAD@parliament.uk,
howarthv@parliament.uk,
howee@parliament.uk,
hyltonr@parliament.uk,
ingep@parliament.uk,
janvrinr@parliament.uk,
jaymh@parliament.uk,
listowelf@parliament.uk,
LLOYDAJ@parliament.uk,
kakkara@parliament.uk,
lowc@parliament.uk,
LUCER@parliament.uk,
lord.mackay@scotcourts.gov.uk,
mancej@parliament.uk,
McFarlanej@parliament.uk,
marm@parliament.uk,
martinm@parliament.uk,
mawsona@parliament.uk,
meachermc@parliament.uk,
mckeem@parliament.uk,
murphyel@parliament.uk,
neubergerj@parliament.uk,
nichollsd@parliament.uk,
northbournec@parliament.uk,
oloann@parliament.uk,
oneillm@parliament.uk,
ouseleyh@parliament.uk,
oxburghe@parliament.uk,
palmerad@parliament.uk,
patel_naren@hotmail.com,
pattenc@parliament.uk,
prasharu@parliament.uk,
ramsbothamd@parliament.uk,
richardsonk@parliament.uk,
rookerj@parliament.uk,
roperj@parliament.uk,
ROSSLYN@parliament.uk,
SaltounF@parliament.uk,
sandwichj@parliament.uk,
skidelskyr@parliament.uk,
dalrymplej@parliament.uk,
SternVH@parliament.uk,
dennis@hdstevenson.co.uk,
stirrupg@parliament.uk,
sutherlands@parliament.uk,
tanlaws@parliament.uk,
taylorjdb@parliament.uk,
tombsf@parliament.uk,
walkermjd@parliament.uk,
walpolerh@parliament.uk,
warnockh@parliament.uk,
watsonm@parliament.uk 

No comments:

Post a Comment